top of page

Understanding the Air Canada Flight Attendant Strike: Public Sentiment and Government Intervention

  • Writer: Laurel Ostfield
    Laurel Ostfield
  • Aug 18
  • 3 min read

Updated: 10 hours ago

The Back-to-Work Order


On August 16, 2025, Minister of Labour Patty Hadju announced a back-to-work order for the ongoing Air Canada flight attendant strike. The goal was to resolve the labor dispute swiftly. However, this decision seems to have misjudged Canadian public opinion. Many Canadians are supporting the flight attendants rather than the union or management. This highlights concerns over unfair work practices, particularly the policy of not paying flight attendants until the plane doors close.


The chart tracks posts in traditional and social media from August 12 to August 18, 2025, of the Air Canada strike across four categories: Government, Cupe, Air Canada Bail Out, and Flight Attendants.
The chart tracks posts in traditional and social media from August 12 to August 18, 2025, across four categories: Government, Cupe, Air Canada Bail Out, and Flight Attendants.

Public Support for Flight Attendants


Data from recent social media and traditional media activity reveals a clear trend. Canadians have overwhelmingly rallied behind the flight attendants. Posts about government intervention and union involvement (CUPE) remained minimal. In contrast, the Flight Attendants category saw a dramatic spike. It peaked at over 1,200 posts on August 17. This surge far outpaced the other categories. It underscores a public focus on the flight attendants’ plight rather than broader union negotiations.


The data suggests that Canadians are less concerned with the union’s role. They are more outraged by the specific issue of unpaid work time. This practice has fueled widespread sympathy for the striking workers.


Minister Hadju’s announcement was intended to restore normalcy. She recognized the negative impact on travelers and the transportation of critical pharmaceutical goods. However, the government’s position seems to have backfired. The back-to-work order has galvanized further support for the flight attendants. They are defying the directive. This is evidenced by the continued rise in posts from 6,415 on August 15 to 16,138 on August 17, representing a 153% increase. This defiance resonates with the public. It reinforces the narrative that flight attendants are fighting for fair compensation—a cause that has struck a chord amid the strike’s disruption.


The Narrative of Corporate Accountability


It is important to look at these numbers in the context of other narratives. The general public's support for flight attendants is reinforced by a huge uptick in mentions of government bailouts received by Air Canada. Mentions went from 51 to 441—a whopping 766% increase. Although this is a very small portion of the total conversation, it highlights the growing momentum of a narrative pointing to corporate executives for poor management practices.


Going even further, based on our sample of X posts, 60% of the top 10 posts with the highest engagement strongly support the flight attendants. In contrast, 20% are neutral. The final 20% come from Air Canada’s official account, each with strongly negative sentiment in the comments, as analyzed by AI.


Independent Polling Data


A recent Angus Reid poll about the strike paints a similar picture. This poll was not commissioned by the airline or CUPE. Its findings are more independent and unassailable than polls funded by the union.


The data paints a clear picture. Canadians are not blindly backing the union. They are specifically championing the flight attendants’ experience and pay equity. Minister Hadju’s intervention may have aimed to end the strike. However, it has instead highlighted a disconnect between government action and public sentiment. This leaves the flight attendants’ struggle at the forefront of this labor dispute.


Conclusion


The ongoing Air Canada flight attendant strike is more than just a labor dispute. It reflects broader issues of fairness and accountability in the workplace. As public sentiment continues to evolve, it is clear that the flight attendants have garnered significant support. The government's attempts to intervene may have inadvertently strengthened their cause. The narrative surrounding this strike is not just about the union or management; it is about the rights of workers and the need for fair treatment in the workplace.


In conclusion, the flight attendants' fight for fair compensation resonates deeply with the public. It serves as a reminder of the importance of standing up for workers' rights in the face of corporate and governmental challenges. The outcome of this strike could have lasting implications for labor relations in Canada.

Comments


bottom of page